This unit was about reproduction, specifically sexual reproduction. I specifically learned the differences between sexual and asexual reproduction, how sex works, and what happens before sex(meiosis, and its steps). We also learned about inheritance, This involved using punnet squares to calculate the probability of offspring having certain traits based off their parents' genotypes. We also learned about dominant, and recessive alleles, which is when one allele is shown over another. Mendel discovered the characteristics and laid down the foundations of genetics. We also learned about some more complicated topics in genetics such as gene linkage, and epistasis.
My main strengths were punnet squares,mitosis and meiosis. My weakness is that i don't quite understand some of the more complected terms yet, and could still use some review on them. Doing the info graphic helped me a lot. It help with both the content side, and the time management side. On the content is was both a test of what I knew, and a review on what I didn't. I had to explain the concepts, so I had to be solid on them, which held me accountable for knowing them.
I still want to know more about genetic mutations. Genetic mutations ave always fascinated me, and the weren't talked about muck in this unit.
I took a VARK Questionnaire to see how I should be studying, and what type of a learner I am. The results were as I expected, I was more kinesthetic(13), and visual(11), than read/write(6) and aural(2). The useful part of the survey was the studying tips. It recommended that I find/draw diagram and that I go back over what i did in labs. I intend to try both of theses new methods of studying on the new test
Wednesday, November 18, 2015
Tuesday, November 17, 2015
Coin Sex Lab
In this lab we learned how to use punnet squares to predict what traits our offspring will have, and how these prediction can deffer from what actually will happen. In this lab we used coins to represent genes, and the two sides of the coin represent the two different alleles for the gene. The flipping of the coins represents meiosis, and the two sets of coins up represents the processes of recombination. The coins also showed how probability of something happening can be different from what actually happens. We did multiple autosomal crosses, where the sex chromosomes are not involved, and one x-linked cross, which is when the sex chromosome are involved. We used two sets of one coin each to represent monohybrid crosses, and two sets of two coins each to represent dihybrid crosses. In some of our tests we labeled both side of the coin the same way to represent a homozygous trait, but in others we labeled the two sides differently to represent a heterozygous trait.
When we preformed the di-hybrid cross, we got results that were slightly different than what was expected. The punnet square gave us a phenotype ratio of:
9 Brown Hair, and Brown eyes : 3 Blond Hair, and Brown eyes : 3 Brown Hair, and blue eyes :
1 Blond Hair, and Blue eyes
Our experiment had slightly different results, and gave us the phenotypic ratio of:
8 Brown Hair, and Brown eyes : 4 Blond Hair, and Brown eyes : 2 Brown Hair, and blue eyes :
2 Blond Hair, and Blue eyes
The slight difference between the probability, and what actually happened is due to the fact that probability, and reality do not always line up. It possible to cross two heterozygotes, and get two recessive alleles in all ten offspring for the same reasons that you can flip a coin ten times and get heads every time. This lab demonstrated the limits of probability. Probability can give you odds on what can happen, but until the event occurs you have no idea what will happen. Relating back to the coin, the probability of getting heads two heads in a row is a 25% chance, but until you flip the coin twice you can't know if you will get two heads.
This lab relates to me because if/when I have children, then I cant use probability to predict what they might be like, but I have no way to know for sure what traits they will have, until they are born.
When we preformed the di-hybrid cross, we got results that were slightly different than what was expected. The punnet square gave us a phenotype ratio of:
9 Brown Hair, and Brown eyes : 3 Blond Hair, and Brown eyes : 3 Brown Hair, and blue eyes :
1 Blond Hair, and Blue eyes
Our experiment had slightly different results, and gave us the phenotypic ratio of:
8 Brown Hair, and Brown eyes : 4 Blond Hair, and Brown eyes : 2 Brown Hair, and blue eyes :
2 Blond Hair, and Blue eyes
The slight difference between the probability, and what actually happened is due to the fact that probability, and reality do not always line up. It possible to cross two heterozygotes, and get two recessive alleles in all ten offspring for the same reasons that you can flip a coin ten times and get heads every time. This lab demonstrated the limits of probability. Probability can give you odds on what can happen, but until the event occurs you have no idea what will happen. Relating back to the coin, the probability of getting heads two heads in a row is a 25% chance, but until you flip the coin twice you can't know if you will get two heads.
This lab relates to me because if/when I have children, then I cant use probability to predict what they might be like, but I have no way to know for sure what traits they will have, until they are born.
Tuesday, November 10, 2015
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)